Aggiunta del 13 gennaio 2021: anche il governo irlandese lo ammette: non abbiamo nulla che provi l’esistenza del virus!

https://rumble.com/vcmrzl-government-in-ireland-forced-to-admit-covid-19-does-not-exist.html

-oOo-

 

Riprendo e traduco questo pezzo-bomba di John Rapopport che, basandosi su un documento del CDC (Center for Disease Control), PROVA CHE NON SI SA SE IL VIRUS ESISTA O MENO.

Come quando, nel 1982, ci fu una conferenza stampa in cui Bob Gallo dichiarò di avere trovato la probabile causa dell’AIDS, cioè l’HIV. Ma quando, decenni dopo, Kary Mullis (lui sì scienziato vero, premio nobel e ricercatore scrupoloso) chiese: “dove si trova il primo articolo scientifico che prova la correlazione fra HIV e AIDS?” nessuno gli seppe dare risposta.

Perchè la notizia era stata data ai media e sui giornali, ma non aveva nessun – ripeto nessuno! – supporto scientifico.

Domanda da uomo della strada: “e perchè abbiamo chiuso la gente in casa allora?”

-oOo-

RapoportCowanSequencing

La pistola fumante: dov’è il coronavirus? Il CDC dice che non è disponibile.

Il documento CDC è intitolato “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” è datato 13 luglio 2020.

Sepolto in profondità nel documento, a pagina 39, in una sezione intitolata “Caratteristiche delle prestazioni“, abbiamo questo: “Poiché non sono attualmente disponibili isolati di virus quantificati del 2019-nCoV, i campioni [test diagnostici] progettati per il rilevamento del 2019 -nCoV RNA sono stati testati con stock caratterizzati di RNA a lunghezza intera trascritto in vitro … ”

La frase chiave è: “Poiché non sono attualmente disponibili isolati di virus quantificati del 2019-nCoV …”

Ogni oggetto esistente può essere quantificato, vale a dire misurato. L’uso del termine “quantificato” in quella frase significa: il CDC non ha una quantità misurabile di virus, perché non è disponibile.

IL CDC NON HA VIRUS. Un ulteriore suggerimento è l’uso della parola “isolati”. Ciò significa che NESSUN VIRUS ISOLATO È DISPONIBILE.

Un altro modo per dirlo:

NESSUNO HA UN ESEMPIO ISOLATO DEL VIRUS COVID-19. NESSUNO HA ISOLATO IL VIRUS COVID-19. QUINDI, NESSUNO HA PROVATO CHE ESISTE.

Come se questa non fosse una rivelazione sufficiente per scioccare il mondo, il CDC prosegue dicendo che stanno presentando un test diagnostico PCR per rilevare il virus-che-non-è stato isolato … e il test sta cercando l’RNA che si presume provenga dal virus di cui non è stata dimostrata l’esistenza.

E usando questo test, il CDC e ogni altra agenzia di sanità pubblica nel mondo stanno contando casi e decessi COVID … e i governi hanno istituito blocchi e devastazioni economiche usando quei casi e numeri di morte come giustificazione.

Se le persone credono “hai il virus ma non è disponibile” e hai il virus tranne che è sepolto in altro materiale e non è stato estratto, purificato e isolato, queste persone credono che la luna sia fatta di formaggio verde.

È come dire:

  • “Abbiamo i 20 trilioni di dollari, sono contenuti da qualche parte nella nostra miriade di conti, semplicemente non sappiamo dove.” Se non sai dove, non sai di avere i soldi.
  • “Le chiavi della macchina sono da qualche parte in casa. Semplicemente non sappiamo dove. ” Veramente? Se non sai dove, non sai che le chiavi sono in casa.
  • “Il missile da crociera mancante è da qualche parte nell’arsenale, semplicemente non sappiamo dove.” No. Se non sai dove, non sai che il missile è nell’arsenale.
  • “Il virus COVID-19 è da qualche parte nel materiale che abbiamo, semplicemente non l’abbiamo rimosso da quel materiale. Ma sappiamo cos’è e l’abbiamo identificato e conosciamo la sua struttura “. NO TU NON. LO ASSUMI.

La scienza non è fatta da assunzioni a priori.

“Ma … ma … c’è uno studio che dice che alcuni ricercatori in un laboratorio hanno isolato il virus …” Dicono di sì. Ma a luglio, il CDC afferma che non è disponibile alcun virus.

Immagino che ciò significhi che i camion non erano disponibili per portare il virus da quel laboratorio al CDC. I camion erano senza benzina. Pioveva. Il ponte è stato slavato. I camion erano nel negozio. Joe, l’autista, non riusciva a trovare la sua maschera e non voleva uscire di casa senza di essa … La scienza non è assunzioni a priori.

La pandemia è una frode, fino alla radice dell’albero velenoso.

 

-oOo-

Aggiunta del 13 ottobre:

Yet another case of the missing virus; they lied and locked down the world
ANOTHER key architect of the PCR test had no coronavirus; the whole fake COVID house is falling down.
“We know exactly what we’re doing, but we have no virus available.”
by Jon Rappoport
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
I’ve been exposing the fact that the CDC, in July of this year, admitted, in a document, that…
They didn’t have the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It wasn’t “available.”
This means they couldn’t obtain an isolated specimen of the virus. There is only reason why.
The virus hasn’t been isolated. And THAT means no one has proved it exists.
And now, I’ve discovered ANOTHER key document. This one apparently formed the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID virus all over the world.
READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be engraved in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.
“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.”
TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus.
“Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”
TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus is closely related to an older coronavirus. We ASSUME we know HOW it is related. We ASSUME, because we don’t have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of nothing. Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus.
“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.”
TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the new virus. We’ve never observed it. We can’t study it directly. There is no proof it exists. But we will use the test to detect it.
The study is titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.” [Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):2000045. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.]
Those quotes from the study are astounding. A diagnostic test for the virus, but there is no virus. No standard against which to compare the reliability of the test.
The authors blithely assume they can somehow infer that the virus exists in the first place, without having an isolated specimen.
Then they assume they can understand the structure of the virus that isn’t there.
The virus isn’t there. It has NOT been isolated. It has NOT been separated out from other material. Therefore, it has not been observed and its existence has not been proved.
And yet, the test which these authors have developed is launched, all over the world, to detect that virus; to promote the unproven notion that there is a pandemic; to form the basis for counting COVID case numbers; and ultimately to justify all the lockdowns which have crashed the global economy and destroyed millions upon millions of lives.
A great deal of confusion has been created, because scientists are now talking about the “new virus” as if they understand its structure and sequence. No. They’ve INTERPRETED that genetic structure. And once they’ve made their interpretations, they gibber about what it means.
It’s like this. A man has a very thick steel vault. He clams there is a pile of treasure inside. But no one can open the door to the vault. People show up with all sorts of fancy instruments, and they make indirect measurements. They then issue very authoritative-sounding statements about what is inside the vault.
But no one can get in there. This is a magic vault, you see. You can’t drill into it. You can’t blow it up. But in its vicinity, all sorts of hustlers are gathered. And they PONTIFICATE. They BLOVIATE. They wave their credentials. Reporters interview them. Governments follow their recommendations.
And that’s all it is. It’s that kind of party.
There is also confusion about what the word “isolate” means, when it comes to viruses. SAYING you have isolated a virus doesn’t mean you have.
It may mean you THINK you have the virus inside a mess of material which contains many different genetic sequences and all manner of cellular debris and who knows what.
Some scientists will claim “a lesser amount of mess” entitles them to state they’ve “isolated” the virus.
Other scientists will claim that because they can grow, in a dish, what they BELIEVE to be the virus, this is “proof” that the virus exists.
They’re wrong.
Still other scientists will say that, in a dish in a lab, they “have the virus growing”, and they know it, because the virus is destroying certain cells in the soup in the dish. But in this soup, there are various added chemicals, and those chemicals could easily be doing the cell-killing.
So they are wrong, too.
As the late independent researcher David Crowe has written: “And the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it means nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is [as] ‘isolation’).”
This is why something called real-world experiments were introduced into science. Experiments that were forced out of the lab into the arena where actual humans live.
In my last article, I described exactly the kind of experiment that should have been initiated five minutes after scientists claimed there was an “outbreak in China.” It’s a large scale study involving humans who were diagnosed with the “epidemic illness.” Tissue samples would be taken from 500 of these patients and correctly analyzed via electron microscope photography.
But studies of that dimension and precision don’t interest scientists who live in the lab. Such studies are too dangerous. There is every chance that, in the harsh glare of sunlight, all their warnings about a vast pandemic will be shown to be false. False and ridiculous. Absurd. And insane.
These “experts” don’t want to take that chance.
So they fiddle and diddle in their labs, and they make wild claims based on nothing, on NO VIRUS.
For them, there is no such thing as NO VIRUS. There must always be a virus. They will build strings of thought that circle around and meet up and shake hands and justify themselves, BY DEFINITION.
When all is said and done, that is what they are playing at. “We make all the definitions, and therefore we can conclude anything we want to conclude. And call it science.”
That’s what’s going on.
I see the con and I’m pointing out the con.
I’m telling scientists who are honest to call it a con, too.
Empty out the house of modern virology; open the windows and let the fresh air in; and then we’ll be living in a far better world.
And, oh yes, prosecute these researchers who devised a test for the virus they never found. Prosecute them for crimes against humanity, and send them to prison.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)

The virus that isn’t there has a hypnotic effect

by Jon Rappoport
I have written several recent articles documenting the fact that the COVID virus is missing in action.
And when I say missing, I’m talking about two MAJOR confessions, from both the CDC and a group of study-authors in Europe…and in each case, these people were in the process of assembling instructions on how to perform the diagnostic PCR test for that very virus. The virus they said they didn’t have.
They didn’t have it because they couldn’t get it.
They couldn’t get it because no one had it.
In other words, the existence of the COVID virus is unproven.
Now, I want to point out three factors that produce a hypnotic effect. Even in the absence of the virus, these factors seem to indicate the virus “must exist.” I’m not talking about government or media pronouncements, which are obvious.
  1. ONE: Scientists and public health agencies claim they’ve ISOLATED the virus. There is no reason to believe them. The term “isolation” is thrown around like a politician throws around the term, “the people.” Isolation of a virus SHOULD mean it is separated out from all the genetic, cellular, microbial, and waste material that surrounds it. But don’t assume, when professionals are talking or writing, that this is what they DO mean. Do not assume that.  For example, they often mean: “We have the virus in a dish in the lab. The soup in the dish contains human cells, chemicals, drugs, and other material. However, we know the virus is there and growing, because it is killing the human cells…” Wrong. There is more than sufficient non-viral substance in the soup that could be doing the cell-killing. And obviously, “the virus” in the dish is surrounded by this mix of material. It is far from isolated. And, as I’ve documented in a previous article, if the CDC, one of the biggest public health agencies in the world, couldn’t get the virus, as of July of this year, and admitted it in writing…”the virus” isn’t isolated.
  2. TWO: This hypnotic effect ropes in some of the brightest medical and scientific professionals, who otherwise challenge all sorts of medical dogma. It is: “The genetic sequence of the virus is well established. Many studies confirm this.” Well, sure. If experts have mapped out the genetic structure of the virus, the virus must exist. Right? Wrong. The sequence is INFERRED. It is ASSUMED. Inferred from what? The genetic sequence could be cobbled together from several sources: the unseparated material “in the dish in the lab”; a piece or pieces of RNA that have been arbitrarily chosen as “relevant clues”; a piece or pieces of synthetic RNA that, again, have been arbitrarily selected according to a bias in favor of a certain type of virus. Bias? What does that mean? I’ll explain. When a few dozen people in Wuhan fell ill, back in 2019, there were a million ways researchers could have gone, in trying to figure out the cause. Of course, as I’ve written, they could have looked out their windows and observed the horrific air pollution hanging over the city, and realized these “unexplained cases” of pneumonia had a ridiculously simple origin. But no. The researchers opted, as they always do, for a “new virus.” And, they chose, without a shred of evidence, to “look for” a germ from the coronavirus family. That was the pre-planned story. That was the bias. From that point on, the die was cast. The “genetic sequencing” involved cobbling together, by assumption and inference, a collage of INFORMATION, into code, which would satisfy the pre-ordained scenario. They ASSEMBLED a genetic sequence that matched what they were going for: a coronavirus. Don’t imagine genetic sequencing is performed by people looking directly at a virus through a cosmic microscope and jotting down the names of rows of genes sitting side by side like cars in a supermarket parking lot.
  3. THREE: The other hypnotic factor is the PCR test. “If the test exists to detect the virus, the virus must exist.” Wrong. The test—which has irreparable and fatal flaws, as I’ve documented—is working, at best, from a fragment of RNA which is ASSUMED to come from the virus. If the test appears to identify that fragment as “relevant,” the test result clams the person is “infected.” People believe the test must mean something. And the only thing it could mean is: it finds the virus in a person, or the virus isn’t in that person’s body. But either way, the virus is real. Wrong. The deck is stacked. The game is rigged. Welcome to the Deep Medical State. As in any truly deep operation, only a small number of elite professionals understand the basic con. The rest are blind, and accepting. Some are willfully blind. They see the truth in a flash of insight, and then they shut up.
However, in this mad “COVID landscape,” minds and doors are opening. The hypnotic haze is receding. The truth is coming out. Doctors, scientists, reporters, and members of the public are discovering and rejecting the Big Con.